Wednesday, January 13, 2010

I Play rightfield, it’s important you know

The recent induction of Andre Dawson into the baseball Hall of Fame has spurred quite a bit of discussion in the baseball and specifically sabremetric community about just how good he really was, and who might have a better case for induction. I wrote a few days ago that I would have voted for six players on the ballot this year, but not for Dawson. He is to me a borderline candidate and as a proponent of a small hall, unless I'm sure the candidate definitely belongs, I wouldn't vote for enshrinement. After looking at the usually evidence (career stats, yearly average, black ink, Keltner test, etc) I remain unsure that Dawson is significantly better than a lot of outfielders that don't belong in the Hall. As a further test, I went to Baseball-Reference.com and looked up a little more data for comparison. Here's what I found:

Chart A: Average 162 game performance - neutralized

 

AB 

R 

H 

2B 

3B 

HR 

RBI 

SB 

BB 

SO 

BA 

OBP 

SLG 

OPS 

RC 

A 

616 

90 

175 

32 

6 

28 

103 

21 

37 

93 

0.284 

0.329 

0.49 

0.819 

99 

B 

594 

107 

187 

31 

8 

12 

66 

61 

96 

63 

0.314 

0.41 

0.455 

0.864 

111 

C 

616 

88 

180 

35 

5 

22 

104 

10 

45 

100 

0.291 

0.34 

0.473 

0.813 

100 

D 

594 

91 

157 

26 

3 

30 

96 

12 

74 

129 

0.265 

0.346 

0.467 

0.813 

99 

E 

632 

96 

184 

28 

6 

28 

111 

4 

50 

110 

0.29 

0.344 

0.488 

0.832 

106 

F 

654 

93 

156 

31 

5 

25 

88 

5 

90 

106 

0.277 

0.377 

0.479 

0.855 

102 

G 

607 

99 

177 

31 

5 

26 

109 

13 

69 

91 

0.291 

0.362 

0.487 

0.849 

108

H 

568 

78 

169 

39 

5 

15 

90 

9 

52 

60 

0.297 

0.359 

0.464 

0.823 

94 

I 

597 

92 

181 

23 

12 

3 

47 

55 

35 

86 

0.303 

0.345 

0.396 

0.741 

82 

J 

573 

89 

164 

32 

4 

25 

94 

6 

73 

92 

0.287 

0.365 

0.488 

0.835 

103 

K 

567 

78 

170 

26 

7 

6 

66 

27 

34 

91 

0.3 

0.338 

0.402 

0.74 

78 

L 

582 

101 

163

29 

3 

35 

111 

14 

87 

149 

0.281 

0.377 

0.524 

0.902 

115 

M 

578 

87 

183 

40 

11 

18 

99 

9 

53 

58 

0.317 

0.375 

0.518 

0.893 

113 

N 

616 

106 

192 

22 

11 

4 

45 

45 

92 

67 

0.311 

0.401 

0.403 

0.804 

100 

O 

578 

94 

164 

31 

5 

27 

91 

14 

62 

109 

0.283 

0.354 

0.495 

0.85 

101 

P 

595 

96 

166 

29 

2

26 

100 

22 

63 

76 

0.279 

0.364 

0.467 

0.831 

97 

Q 

625 

87 

163 

32 

4 

30 

107 

17 

39 

102 

0.26 

0.307 

0.466 

0.773 

90 


 

Players A-Q are all outfielders chosen for a few specific criteria. Four are members of the Hall of Fame and many of the rest were or are strong candidates. They were also chosen because they had a similar skill set to either Andre Dawson or Tim Raines (my favorite among the outfield candidates.) Can you tell which ones belong in the HoF and who doesn't?

What if I throw in this information?

Player

Seasons 

Black Ink

Test 

MVP awards 

A 

21 

11 

1 

B 

23 

20 

0 

C 

19 

26 

1 

D 

18 

31 

2 

E 

16 

33 

1 

F 

20 

15 

0 

G 

22 

4 

0 

H 

19 

9 

0 

I 

19 

18 

0 

J 

17 

15 

1 

K 

18 

12 

1 

L 

21 

35 

1 

M 

13 

1 

0 

N 

17 

16 

0 

O 

18 

6 

0 

P 

19 

8 

1 

Q 

16 

9 

0 


 

This probably disqualifies M for having too short a career and only 1 point on the Black Ink Test. G, H, O, P, and Q were clearly not dominant in their times. Most of these players racked up impressive numbers due to longevity rather than a series of great seasons. Are C, D, E, and L the Hall of Famers? They all won MVP awards and the average Hall of Famer only scores 26 on the Black Ink Test. In fact of those four only E – Jim Rice and L – Reggie Jackson are in. C& D are Dave Parker and Dale Murphy, two candidates who have received some support but will likely never get in. The other two Hall of Famers are A- the newly inducted Andre Dawson and G – Dave Winfield. Neither stands out as an especially strong candidate, and Winfield especially looks like a poor choice when you look at the second chart. I don't think this proves that Dawson and Winfield should be out and Parker and Murphy in, but it does illustrate the problem of primarily looking at career statistics and not looking at players in context.

Here's the whole chart with names included:

 

AB 

R 

H 

2B 

3B 

HR 

RBI 

SB 

BB 

SO 

BA 

OBP 

SLG 

OPS 

RC 

Seasons 

Black Ink

Test 

MVP awards 

Dawson 

616 

90 

175 

32 

6 

28 

103 

21 

37 

93 

0.284 

0.329 

0.49 

0.819 

99 

21 

11 

1 

Raines 

594 

107 

187 

31 

8 

12 

66 

61 

96 

63 

0.314 

0.41 

0.455 

0.864 

111 

23 

20 

0 

Parker 

616

88 

180 

35 

5 

22 

104 

10 

45 

100 

0.291 

0.34 

0.473 

0.813 

100 

19 

26 

1 

Murphy 

594 

91 

157 

26 

3 

30 

96 

12 

74 

129 

0.265 

0.346 

0.467 

0.813 

99 

18 

31 

2 

Rice 

632 

96 

184 

28 

6 

28 

111 

4 

50 

110 

0.29 

0.344 

0.488 

0.832 

106 

16 

33 

1 

Dw. Evans 

654 

93 

156 

31 

5 

25 

88 

5 

90 

106 

0.277 

0.377 

0.479 

0.855 

102 

20 

15 

0 

Winfield 

607 

99 

177 

31 

5 

26 

109 

13 

69 

91 

0.291 

0.362 

0.487 

0.849 

108 

22 

4 

0 

H. McRae 

568 

78 

169 

39 

5 

15 

90 

9 

52 

60 

0.297 

0.359 

0.464 

0.823 

94 

19 

9 

0 

W. Wilson 

597 

92 

181 

23 

12 

3 

47 

55 

35 

86 

0.303 

0.345 

0.396 

0.741 

82 

19 

18 

0 

Lynn 

573 

89 

164 

32 

4 

25 

94 

6 

73 

92 

0.287 

0.365 

0.488 

0.835 

103 

17 

15 

1 

W. McGee 

567 

78 

170 

26 

7 

6 

66 

27 

34 

91 

0.3 

0.338 

0.402 

0.74 

78 

18 

12 

1 

R. Jackson 

582 

101 

163 

29 

3 

35 

111 

14 

87 

149 

0.281 

0.377 

0.524 

0.902 

115 

21 

35 

1 

B. Herman 

578 

87 

183 

40 

11 

18 

99 

9 

53 

58 

0.317 

0.375 

0.518 

0.893 

113 

13 

1 

0 

B. Butler 

616 

106 

192 

22 

11 

4 

45 

45 

92 

67 

0.311 

0.401 

0.403 

0.804 

100 

17 

16 

0 

Burks 

578 

94 

164 

31 

5 

27 

91 

14 

62 

109 

0.283 

0.354 

0.495 

0.85 

101 

18 

6 

0 

Baylor 

595 

96 

166 

29 

2 

26 

100 

22 

63 

76 

0.279 

0.364

0.467 

0.831 

97 

19 

8 

1 

J. Carter 

625 

87 

163 

32 

4 

30 

107 

17 

39 

102 

0.26 

0.307 

0.466 

0.773 

90 

16 

9 

0 


 


 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment